A brand new supernova captured by the Hubble Space Telescope might act as a decoder for different star explosions.
Given that the telescope caught the star so early in its “cataclysmic demise,” as NASA known as it, astronomers say the analysis might ultimately assist them formulate an early warning system for different stars that is perhaps about to blow up.
Scientists are dubbing the occasion, often known as SN 2020fqv, because the “Rosetta Stone of supernovas.” That’s a reference to the Rosetta Stone, which has the identical textual content written in three totally different scripts, permitting historians to learn Egyptian hieroglyphs. (The stone was inscribed in historic Greek, which was well-known to students, in addition to two types of Egyptian script, which have been then poorly understood.)
The precise stone, courting from about 2,200 years in the past, was discovered accidentally in 1799 by troopers in Napoleon’s military campaigning in Egypt; you possibly can see it at this time within the British Museum in London. Investigators for the Hubble discovery admitted the time period “Rosetta Stone” is used usually as a metaphor for deciphering data, however famous the time period is an apt description for the significance of this new cosmic work.
Related: The best Hubble Space Telescope images of all time!
“This is the first time we’ve been able to verify the mass with these three different methods for one supernova, and all of them are consistent,” lead creator Samaporn Tinyanont, a graduate pupil in astronomy at California Institute of Technology, said in a NASA statement.
“Now we can push forward using these different methods and combining them, because there are a lot of other supernovas where we have masses from one method but not another.”
SN 2020fqv was discovered amid the Butterfly galaxies, a pair of spiral galaxies positioned roughly 60 million light-years away from Earth within the constellation Virgo. The supernova was first found in April 2020 by the Zwicky Transient Facility on the Palomar Observatory in San Diego, California.
Coincidentally, the supernova was additionally within the view of the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS), whose major mission is to seek for comparatively close by planets outdoors of our solar system. Soon, Hubble and several other ground-based telescopes joined the multinational observatory star celebration.
Hubble’s sharp eyes allowed the observatory to have a look at the fabric shut by the star, often known as circumstellar materials, just a few hours after the explosion occurred. Because the fabric clung onto the star till the final 12 months of its life, astronomers say learning these things permits additional analysis into what the star was doing earlier than it died.
“We rarely get to examine this very close-in circumstellar material since it is only visible for a very short time, and we usually don’t start observing a supernova until at least a few days after the explosion,” Tinyanont stated. “For this supernova, we were able to make ultra-rapid observations with Hubble, giving unprecedented coverage of the region right next to the star that exploded.”
Helpfully, Hubble additionally has an archive of observations of this star courting to the Nineteen Nineties. Astronomers probed the picture collection and added TESS observations of the system each half-hour within the days earlier than the explosion, in addition to through the explosion itself and for a number of extra weeks (earlier than, we assume, the usual schedule of TESS shifted the telescope to stare upon one other spot within the sky.)
Scientists then calculated the mass of the exploding star utilizing three totally different strategies: evaluating observations with theoretical fashions, utilizing data from a 1997 archival picture of Hubble (this was to rule out higher-mass stars within the mannequin), and measuring the quantity of oxygen within the supernova, which is a proxy for mass. All three strategies produced constant outcomes, with an estimate of 14 to fifteen instances the mass of our personal sun.
One of the extra well-known unstable stars is Betelgeuse, a crimson supergiant that’s late in its life and put up some antics within the final 12 months or so. Co-author Ryan Foley, an astrophysicist on the University of California, Santa Cruz, stated he would not consider Betelgeuse itself is about to blow up, however added that SN 2020fqv will assist in constructing our database of stars to observe.
“This could be a warning system,” Foley stated of the explosion conduct Hubble and different observatories famous. “So if you see a star start to shake around a bit, start acting up, then maybe we should pay more attention and really try to understand what’s going on there before it explodes. As we find more and more of these supernovae with this sort of excellent data set, we’ll be able to understand better what’s happening in the last few years of a star’s life.”
A paper primarily based on the analysis was printed Thursday (Oct. 21) within the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Follow Elizabeth Howell on Twitter @howellspace. Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.
